Dreaming of Blue: Water and Mars

P1010632You live on a world of dry red rock. Something’s missing. Air? Check. Gravity? Check.294 days worth of Tang? Check, check, check. So, what could it be? A visual sweep of the white half-sphere in which we dwell quickly reveals the deficiency. Of the three color cones a human eye can possess, two barely see use here: green and blue.

The sMars spectrum looks like this: On clear days, a weak circle of blue sky becomes visible through our hazy plastic windows. Small green plants litter the common areas. One little bottle crop even has yellow flowers! The hues of those home-grown leaves is more vibrant by far than the foods we have, particularly the pea-soup shade of our dehydrated spinach. Some of the grow-lights blink and wink in nearly-neon blues and greens. And that, my friends, is the entire palette. Red, white and fleeting hints of blue with a bit of green tossed in here and theregood sunset 11_2Suffice it to say, you look forward to – even crave – the smallest traces of color; and moisture, too. The circuits of your central processing units could care less that you’ve come 50 million miles to conduct critical space research. Children of Earth, be forewarned: wherever you go, your brain continues to expect certain types of input. So it was that that after 2.5 months of seeing no body of water bigger than a 5-gallon-bucket, and no slice of heaven wider than my spacesuit visor, after reading that the Sun is stripping away 900 lbs of Martian atmosphere per hour, I had the single most vivid dream I’ve had since landing on sMars – one of the most vivid dreams of my life. I dreamed about blue.

Mind you, this was not the blurry, pale blue that we see through our Sun-scarred porthole. This blue the kind of deep color we see on our computer monitors, brilliantly alive in the very pictures we take while we’re outside our suits. It was the blue that swirls over the mountaintops around Mauna Kea as if the Hawaiian ocean has been tipped into the sky. In my dream, this blue was DAZZLING. It was water – not deep and dark, like seawater, but limpid, like a pond, or perhaps a lagoon. My last thought before waking was, “I’ll be right back with my suit.”
P1010615My eyes opened. The room was dark. I sat up. A crack of light leaked under the doorway. 7:20, said the face of my solar-powered watch (which I hang in the porthole windows once a week to charge up). That’s the time the metronome in my head likes to wake me up if I’m not already awake.

Dear metronome: could you wait until AFTER I’ve had a quick dip next time? Thanks a million.

I hopped out of my bunk, washed my hands in recycled water, and headed for the kitchen. When I arrived, the usual systems sign, “Water Condition: Normal” had been replaced by, “Water condition: Restricted.” A quick glance thru the porthole told me that it was going to be a low power day, too. Welcome to a very space-like day on simulated Mars.

Water usage Around the World.

Water Usage on the Planet Earth. Data Courtesy of 360 Data. http://www.data360.org/dsg.aspx?data_set_group_id=757

Not that we waste water even on an average day. When Water Condition = Normal, individual HI-SEAS crew members use less water than the average person living in Nigeria: ~5 gallons, or 19 liters, per person per day. That’s for eating, drinking, preparing food; washing dishes and clothes; cleaning the habitat and our bodies; and watering plants.  That’s low. So low that’s it’s only a  few more liters per day than the amount available to people living in Uganda, Rwanda, Haiti, and Ethiopia.

We can get away with this in large part because of our composting toilet system. The toilets here use exactly zero water. On top of that, we recycle the water in our sinks and shower in buckets, later transferring the excess water to washing floors during our weekly cleaning.

Owing in large part to flushing toilets – plus watering lawns and long showers – the average America uses 525 liters of water per person per day. To put that into perspective, the average Olympic sized swimming pool has 2,500,000 liters*. So the Average American uses an Olympic Swimming pool full of water every 13 years or so. By contrast, The average sMartian (assuming we are average) would take 360 years to use the same amount**. And the average astronaut….?

Right off the bat, unlike their North American counterparts, astronauts living on the ISS don’t use 50 liters of water to take a

Image Courtesy of NASA.

Image Courtesy of NASA.

shower.  It’s far closer to 4. Unlike sMars, in terms of water, the ISS is a completely closed system. Almost every drop is captured and reused. This includes water from obvious places, like peeing, tooth brushing, hand-washing, and less-obvious ones, like breathing. We each lose about 800 ml a day just by breathing through our mouths and our skin (aka sweating). All of this recycling amounts to 40,000 pounds of water that DOESN’T have to get shipped to the ISS from the Earth. At $10,000/pound, that’s a pretty spiffy cost-savings.

Now the question is: how much water will we have to send to Mars – and what will it COST?

The people here on Mauna Loa are getting by on not THAT much water a day, but 19 liters/person for a six-person crew on a 1-year mission still equals a LOT Of water (41639 liters, or 1.7% if that Olympic swimming pool***). Let’s say that we only send along enough for Mars explorers to live under WATER CONDITION = LOW. That’s ~5 gallons TOTAL, 19 liters exactly, used by the entire group. Think about 1-liter soda bottles. Empty 19 of those into a tub. That’s all the water the six of us use on CONDITION LOW days. On water restriction days, the whole HI-SEAS crew uses less water than the denizens of the vast deserts of Mozambique. Still, sending only that much water would cost…wait for it…more than $152,000,000. Which…is a lot of money.

It’s critical to note that on those low water days, we don’t shower, fill crop tanks, clean the hab, or do laundry. Being able to do those things on a regular basis is important. That’s why, according to the UN, the “poverty threshold” for water is 50 liters per person per day. The amount that we use around here is exactly ten times less than that. To send a crew of six people to Mars with a water supply that would keep them 10 times below the water poverty level would cost around 913 M.

So, what’s the alternative to spending that much cash to send that little water? There are two that I know of.

Image Courtesy of NASA.

Image Courtesy of NASA.

The first option is to make the water we need as we need it using a water reclamation and purification system like the one on the ISS. The good news is that this system works like a charm AND only costs $250 million dollars. That number would have sounded quite large a minute ago, right? Now that you know what it’s going to cost just to launch 5 gallons per person per day into orbit, the reclamation system seems like a bargain-and-a-half. Add in the fact that with fuel cells, you can MAKE water at the same time that you are making energy. Now you’re, quite literally, cookin’ with gas. Hydrogen goes into the cells; out comes water, oxygen, energy, and heat: all things you really need in space, and on Mars.

The second option is to find it, or at least find some of it, when we get there. That possiblity is closely tied to a question that we’ve been asked continually since October: what about water on Mars?

Yes, absolutely: it’s there. It flows. As beautifully described by our Chief Engineer, we’ve had photos of “water-like” changes to the landscape since 2011, which is when Andrzej pressed the button and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter shot photos of the Horowitz Crater. The force beneath those flows is now known to be water – freezing, melting, and refreezing again.

Image Courtesy of the US Department of Energy. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/Feg/animation/intro.html

Image Courtesy of the US Department of Energy. http://www.fueleconomy.gov/Feg/animation/intro.html

What does that mean for us, as future explorers? Well, it’s not BAD news, that’s for sure. The more specific question is: what are the odds that we’re going to be allowed to USE that water for essential tasks like cooking, cleaning, drinking, and growing plants?

My guess is: if we are allowed to at all, it will be later, not sooner. For at least the first 5 or 6 years, we’ll be furiously searching for signs of life in the area in and around those flows. We won’t be digging wells for a good long while. Distilling water vapor from the threadbare Martian atmosphere is a possibility.

Theefficiency of that process is unknown, but we might be able to take advantage of a fun fact: at night, the small about of atmosphere that Mars does have becomes 100% saturated, meaning that any water hanging around may well condense out and become collectible.

In the end, there are surprisingly few things that we need to survive for a year in space. The list includes air pressure, and the right mix of gases to breathe; nutrition; radiation shielding; water and energy. Current technology has the tools to handle all of this: the water reclaimers, the fuel cells, the air purification and compression systems. We bring the tool and make the magic happen.

Human water requirements vary by age, state of health, and level of activity. Image courtesy of University of Texas Medical Branch. http://www.utmb.edu/pedi_ed/CORE/Fluids&Electyrolytes/page_04.htm

As a doctor, I would be much happier if that year included gravity, of course. For now, I’ll be content with my dreams, and the occasional bright flashes of blue they bring to my otherwise rather red and white world. I’ll also ponder this: we know how much adults on Earth have to drink to stay healthy, and we know how much adults in zero gravity have to drink to stay healthy. We have no idea how much people on Mars will need to drink to maintain their fluid balance, and to live and work in good health. That depends upon what 1/3rd gravity does to the human metabolic rate – after half a year in space (or more). That, my friends, will be a mystery, right up to the point when we put the weight of our feet down on that dry(ish) red earth.

 

 

* Assuming pool’s volume to be 25m x 50m x 2m = 2,500m3; 1m3 of water is 1000 Liters.  So, 2,500 x 1000 = 2,500,000).

** 6940 liters per year is our current individual usage on an average day at HI-SEAS, as opposed to 191756 for the average American (We use 96% less water).

*** (19 * 6 * 365.25) = 41639 liters for the 6-person crew

**** 5 gallons at 8.34 pounds per gallon (that’s deionized water at ~ 65 degF) = 57838lbs x 365.25 x $10,000/lb

9 thoughts on “Dreaming of Blue: Water and Mars

  1. Thanks for sharing this information about water. Here in the UK we are in another wet spell but we are always minded not to waste water as another dry winter and spring will bring back summer water hardships. Please keep your posts coming and I really enjoy hearing from you. On this side of our planet I had a big birthday (its an age with a 0 at the end of it) and I toasted your health and safety today. Best wishes
    Chris

      1. Hi you guys,
        Haven’t heard from you for a while. I hope that everything is OK with you and that you are all fine. In the UK everything is cool -really- with the run up to the festive season in full swing. Take care
        Chris

  2. Wow, awesome blog entry ! Thank you for sharing with us your daily life 🙂

    That water restriction once on Mars seems a bit dump : Why giving priority rather to martian water study rather than crew survival ?
    There is sure a hell of numerous places on Mars to find life. I mean, maybe astronauts could get water from the Poles’ ice and study water from the craters to look up for life ?

    And that gravity problem seems really weird. I mean, sending people on Mars with a “have good luck with gravity” doesn’t sound much like NASA’s way to proceed… Or am I missing something ?
    Couldn’t NASA or other space agencies send animals and robots to study those animals and the way gravity affect them ?

    Ultimately, I hope we won’t encounter problems on Mars, but as it goes from now, I bet my hat that there will be a lot of deaths during Mars future missions…

    Keep going and be courageous for the lack of colors !
    I’m everyday with you, sMartians !
    Have a nice day,
    Adriano.

    1. Adriano: Not testing things before sending them is definitely NOT NASA’s way. However, simulating 1/3 gravity on any useful scale for any useful length of time is technically challenging and hellaciously expensive. There is nowhere that we can send humans or animals to test life in 1/3rg. Zero g, yes, but 1/3rd, no. Thank you for the good wishes!

  3. Shey,

    One quick question…You described the colors around you, do you think that “painting” the walls of the habitat the many colors of a rainbow would improve your isolation? White is a bit boring and a lot of research has been explored on the psychological effects colors have on humans. What do you think?

    1. Hi Dwight: Good question. We’re here to do science, for sure. Though we do biology and medicine in here, it’s neither a laboratory nor a medical clinic. It’s our home. While I don’t think more colors would improve our sense of isolation – we’re alone no matter what colors we see – I do think that painting the airlock walls picnic blue would be soothing. More colors would help dispel some of the relentless WHITENESS of this place. It would be pleasant, if not therapeutic, to have a little more color. We’ve done our best by hanging some Tibetan prayer flags and installing colorful LEDs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *